<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Post Institutes New Twitter Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/09/26/washington-post-institutes-new-twitter-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/09/26/washington-post-institutes-new-twitter-policy/</link>
	<description>Where News &#38; Tweets Converge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 03:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Symphony E</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/09/26/washington-post-institutes-new-twitter-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Symphony E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=323#comment-310</guid>
		<description>Организация СтройНормоТруд - предоставление качественных услуг: Нормативные наблюдения.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Организация СтройНормоТруд &#8211; предоставление качественных услуг: Нормативные наблюдения.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Journalism, Meet Twitter (two paradoxes) &#171; A/V Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/09/26/washington-post-institutes-new-twitter-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Journalism, Meet Twitter (two paradoxes) &#171; A/V Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=323#comment-187</guid>
		<description>[...] not to increase it by $1 for healthcare reform? Sad.&#8221;) the Washington Post created its own twitter policy, ruling that “Nothing we do [on Twitter and Facebook] must call into question the impartiality of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not to increase it by $1 for healthcare reform? Sad.&#8221;) the Washington Post created its own twitter policy, ruling that “Nothing we do [on Twitter and Facebook] must call into question the impartiality of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter and the Post &#171; Exploring Convergence</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/09/26/washington-post-institutes-new-twitter-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter and the Post &#171; Exploring Convergence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=323#comment-186</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter Journalism: Washington Post Institutes new Twitter policy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter Journalism: Washington Post Institutes new Twitter policy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tedmay</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/09/26/washington-post-institutes-new-twitter-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>tedmay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=323#comment-253</guid>
		<description>Mijn annoe heeft een heel schraal gevoel nadat ik pepercocktail heb gezopen in urk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mijn annoe heeft een heel schraal gevoel nadat ik pepercocktail heb gezopen in urk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tedmay</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/09/26/washington-post-institutes-new-twitter-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>tedmay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=323#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Mijn annoe heeft een heel schraal gevoel nadat ik pepercocktail heb gezopen in urk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mijn annoe heeft een heel schraal gevoel nadat ik pepercocktail heb gezopen in urk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobinJP</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/09/26/washington-post-institutes-new-twitter-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>RobinJP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=323#comment-252</guid>
		<description>I agree.  It reminds me of 3 or 4 years ago when newspapers had strict policies about who could blog. I remember hearing editors talk about how columnists could blog, but other reporters probably couldn&#039;t handle it.  If you don&#039;t trust your people in 140 characters, how can you trust them talking to strangers for 140 inches?  &lt;br&gt;Nice work yourself. I like how you&#039;ve told today&#039;s tale through Twitter screen shots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  It reminds me of 3 or 4 years ago when newspapers had strict policies about who could blog. I remember hearing editors talk about how columnists could blog, but other reporters probably couldn&#39;t handle it.  If you don&#39;t trust your people in 140 characters, how can you trust them talking to strangers for 140 inches?  <br />Nice work yourself. I like how you&#39;ve told today&#39;s tale through Twitter screen shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckanal</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/09/26/washington-post-institutes-new-twitter-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>ckanal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=323#comment-251</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the opting out altogether is what gets me. Nice write-up! Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the opting out altogether is what gets me. Nice write-up! Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobinJP</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/09/26/washington-post-institutes-new-twitter-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>RobinJP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 08:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=323#comment-250</guid>
		<description>Of course,  we don&#039;t yet know what the policy is.  Narisetti may have just quit to avoid criticism.  But it does seem like this is a head-in-the-sand reaction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/XIhG3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Social media has NOTHING to do with objectivity.  &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course,  we don&#39;t yet know what the policy is.  Narisetti may have just quit to avoid criticism.  But it does seem like this is a head-in-the-sand reaction.</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/XIhG3" rel="nofollow"><b>Social media has NOTHING to do with objectivity.  </b></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckanal</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/09/26/washington-post-institutes-new-twitter-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>ckanal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 07:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=323#comment-249</guid>
		<description>OK, well, I agree with that. But I also feel this policy is a bit strict and kind of silly in general, and we don&#039;t even know the entire guidelines because they&#039;re not public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, well, I agree with that. But I also feel this policy is a bit strict and kind of silly in general, and we don&#39;t even know the entire guidelines because they&#39;re not public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/09/26/washington-post-institutes-new-twitter-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 06:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=323#comment-248</guid>
		<description>Sure you can have personality. But the personality you display (in your public persona, as a professional) should not at any time include your opinions or show a bias in any way. It&#039;s a fine line to walk, but it&#039;s ALWAYS been that way. Not displaying a bias is a basic rule of good journalism....and those rules don&#039;t go away just because we have new ways to interact with an audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure you can have personality. But the personality you display (in your public persona, as a professional) should not at any time include your opinions or show a bias in any way. It&#39;s a fine line to walk, but it&#39;s ALWAYS been that way. Not displaying a bias is a basic rule of good journalism&#8230;.and those rules don&#39;t go away just because we have new ways to interact with an audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
