<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mainstream Media Losing Its Edge In Breaking News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/07/19/mainstream-media-losing-its-edge-in-breaking-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/07/19/mainstream-media-losing-its-edge-in-breaking-news/</link>
	<description>Where News &#38; Tweets Converge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 03:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ckanal</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/07/19/mainstream-media-losing-its-edge-in-breaking-news/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>ckanal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=293#comment-274</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a pretty bold statement. I&#039;m not sure newspapers should get out of breaking news entirely, but I&#039;m glad you added the &quot;print&quot; disclaimer - I agree with that. Personally, I think newspapers in print should focus more on analysis, useful illustrations/data, and other types of content for print editions rather than breaking news. But breaking news online, IMO, is a neccessity for any newspaper.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for sending this and sharing the link - interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s a pretty bold statement. I&#39;m not sure newspapers should get out of breaking news entirely, but I&#39;m glad you added the &#8220;print&#8221; disclaimer &#8211; I agree with that. Personally, I think newspapers in print should focus more on analysis, useful illustrations/data, and other types of content for print editions rather than breaking news. But breaking news online, IMO, is a neccessity for any newspaper.</p>
<p>Thanks for sending this and sharing the link &#8211; interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckanal</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/07/19/mainstream-media-losing-its-edge-in-breaking-news/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>ckanal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=293#comment-167</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a pretty bold statement. I&#039;m not sure newspapers should get out of breaking news entirely, but I&#039;m glad you added the &quot;print&quot; disclaimer - I agree with that. Personally, I think newspapers in print should focus more on analysis, useful illustrations/data, and other types of content for print editions rather than breaking news. But breaking news online, IMO, is a neccessity for any newspaper.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for sending this and sharing the link - interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s a pretty bold statement. I&#39;m not sure newspapers should get out of breaking news entirely, but I&#39;m glad you added the &#8220;print&#8221; disclaimer &#8211; I agree with that. Personally, I think newspapers in print should focus more on analysis, useful illustrations/data, and other types of content for print editions rather than breaking news. But breaking news online, IMO, is a neccessity for any newspaper.</p>
<p>Thanks for sending this and sharing the link &#8211; interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/07/19/mainstream-media-losing-its-edge-in-breaking-news/comment-page-1/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=293#comment-273</guid>
		<description>What is clear is that newspapers--at least in their print editions--have got to get out of the &quot;breaking news&quot; business, what with Twitter scooping them left and right. (Some newspapers are using Twitter to break news, too, yes, but many of these still don&#039;t understand how to use Twitter effectively; notice how so many of them send out 3-4 tweets at a time, as if were something you did once a day to get out of the way.) More on this:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://twurl.cc/1bo8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://twurl.cc/1bo8&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is clear is that newspapers&#8211;at least in their print editions&#8211;have got to get out of the &#8220;breaking news&#8221; business, what with Twitter scooping them left and right. (Some newspapers are using Twitter to break news, too, yes, but many of these still don&#39;t understand how to use Twitter effectively; notice how so many of them send out 3-4 tweets at a time, as if were something you did once a day to get out of the way.) More on this:  <a href="http://twurl.cc/1bo8" rel="nofollow">http://twurl.cc/1bo8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/07/19/mainstream-media-losing-its-edge-in-breaking-news/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=293#comment-166</guid>
		<description>What is clear is that newspapers--at least in their print editions--have got to get out of the &quot;breaking news&quot; business, what with Twitter scooping them left and right. (Some newspapers are using Twitter to break news, too, yes, but many of these still don&#039;t understand how to use Twitter effectively; notice how so many of them send out 3-4 tweets at a time, as if were something you did once a day to get out of the way.) More on this:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://twurl.cc/1bo8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://twurl.cc/1bo8&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is clear is that newspapers&#8211;at least in their print editions&#8211;have got to get out of the &#8220;breaking news&#8221; business, what with Twitter scooping them left and right. (Some newspapers are using Twitter to break news, too, yes, but many of these still don&#39;t understand how to use Twitter effectively; notice how so many of them send out 3-4 tweets at a time, as if were something you did once a day to get out of the way.) More on this:  <a href="http://twurl.cc/1bo8" rel="nofollow">http://twurl.cc/1bo8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckanal</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/07/19/mainstream-media-losing-its-edge-in-breaking-news/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>ckanal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 07:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=293#comment-272</guid>
		<description>Interesting post, thanks for sharing it - very well written. Agreed that it is not Twitter itself, but rather people who break the news...but yes, it provides the medium to every day people that makes it so easy to publish and &quot;break news&quot; themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, thanks for sharing it &#8211; very well written. Agreed that it is not Twitter itself, but rather people who break the news&#8230;but yes, it provides the medium to every day people that makes it so easy to publish and &#8220;break news&#8221; themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckanal</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/07/19/mainstream-media-losing-its-edge-in-breaking-news/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>ckanal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=293#comment-164</guid>
		<description>Interesting post, thanks for sharing it - very well written. Agreed that it is not Twitter itself, but rather people who break the news...but yes, it provides the medium to every day people that makes it so easy to publish and &quot;break news&quot; themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, thanks for sharing it &#8211; very well written. Agreed that it is not Twitter itself, but rather people who break the news&#8230;but yes, it provides the medium to every day people that makes it so easy to publish and &#8220;break news&#8221; themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RickyWhy</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/07/19/mainstream-media-losing-its-edge-in-breaking-news/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>RickyWhy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=293#comment-271</guid>
		<description>The news &quot;broken&quot; on Twitter is really no different from someone running down the street saying, &quot;Guess what I just saw&quot; or a trucker getting on his CB radio to tell his convoy about an accident up ahead. These are means of communicating out an eyewitness account. Twitter adds an eavesdropping element that&#039;s available to everyone, but one that comes naturally to journalists. &lt;a href=&quot;http://tr.im/txWV&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tr.im/txWV&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news &#8220;broken&#8221; on Twitter is really no different from someone running down the street saying, &#8220;Guess what I just saw&#8221; or a trucker getting on his CB radio to tell his convoy about an accident up ahead. These are means of communicating out an eyewitness account. Twitter adds an eavesdropping element that&#39;s available to everyone, but one that comes naturally to journalists. <a href="http://tr.im/txWV" rel="nofollow">http://tr.im/txWV</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RickyWhy</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/07/19/mainstream-media-losing-its-edge-in-breaking-news/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>RickyWhy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=293#comment-163</guid>
		<description>The news &quot;broken&quot; on Twitter is really no different from someone running down the street saying, &quot;Guess what I just saw&quot; or a trucker getting on his CB radio to tell his convoy about an accident up ahead. These are means of communicating out an eyewitness account. Twitter adds an eavesdropping element that&#039;s available to everyone, but one that comes naturally to journalists. &lt;a href=&quot;http://tr.im/txWV&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tr.im/txWV&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news &#8220;broken&#8221; on Twitter is really no different from someone running down the street saying, &#8220;Guess what I just saw&#8221; or a trucker getting on his CB radio to tell his convoy about an accident up ahead. These are means of communicating out an eyewitness account. Twitter adds an eavesdropping element that&#39;s available to everyone, but one that comes naturally to journalists. <a href="http://tr.im/txWV" rel="nofollow">http://tr.im/txWV</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckanal</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/07/19/mainstream-media-losing-its-edge-in-breaking-news/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>ckanal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=293#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Good summary - very well said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good summary &#8211; very well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckanal</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterjournalism.com/2009/07/19/mainstream-media-losing-its-edge-in-breaking-news/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>ckanal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterjournalism.com/?p=293#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Good summary - very well said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good summary &#8211; very well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
